"I’ve long suspected, based on observations of myself as well as observations of society, that, beyond the psychological and cognitive strains produced by what we call information overload, there is a point in intellectual inquiry when adding more information decreases understanding rather than increasing it. Taleb’s observation that as the frequency of information sampling increases, the amount of noise we take in expands more quickly than the amount of signal might help to explain the phenomenon, particularly if human understanding hinges as much or more on the noise-to-signal ratio of the information we take in as on the absolute amount of signal we’re exposed to. Because we humans seem to be natural-born signal hunters, we’re terrible at regulating our intake of information. We’ll consume a ton of noise if we sense we may discover an added ounce of signal. So our instinct is at war with our capacity for making sense."

- Rough Type: Nicholas Carr’s Blog: A little more signal, a lot more noise (via ayjay)

(via anti-teachings)

Source: roughtype.com
  1. thesecularsoup reblogged this from anti-teachings
  2. lauracricket reblogged this from ayjay
  3. worsethandetroit reblogged this from varanine
  4. scarlettlikesducks reblogged this from wildcat2030
  5. varanine reblogged this from notevensurewhy
  6. notevensurewhy reblogged this from anti-teachings
  7. ccotten reblogged this from ayjay
  8. anti-teachings reblogged this from wildcat2030
  9. raisonneuse reblogged this from wildcat2030
  10. seanabel reblogged this from ayjay
  11. questionall reblogged this from wildcat2030
  12. intotheblackandblue reblogged this from wildcat2030
  13. wildcat2030 reblogged this from ayjay
  14. pegobry said: ARGHBLARGBLARGBLBLBL
  15. ayjay posted this